Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Muniz, Maristela Cury
 |
Orientador(a): |
Shimura, Sergio Seiji |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8985
|
Resumo: |
The aim of this work is to establish a concept of malicious fraud and to systematize the ways of execution of penalties and condemnations of lawsuits for damages, both resulted from the hypothesis described by the article 17th of the Brazilian Civil Procedural Code. The justification of this work is that the lack clarity of the malicious fraud s legislation, its concept, importance and application is embarrassing the repression, by the Judge, of malicious fraud s manifestations, which are each time more commonly verified and aggravated. This circumstance, indirectly, stimulate the practice of malicious fraud and procedural chicanery, offending Justice s dignity. In this manner, this work will examine some aspects of the execution of penalties and condemnations of lawsuits for damages, both resulted from the hypothesis described by the article 17th of the Brazilian Civil Procedural Code, so that it will be demonstrated, here, how simple and practicable its application can be |