Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2006 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Ninin, Maria Otilia Guimarães |
| Orientador(a): |
Magalhães, Maria Cecilia Camargo |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
|
| Departamento: |
Lingüística
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13849
|
Resumo: |
This research aims to discuss and characterize the Collaborative Research, considered as an activity system that offers an important context for the critical-collaborative construction of the knowledge in educational environments. In order to delineate the differences between collaborative research and collaborative actions in the research , I discussed the actions of the research, in order to bring about in the researchers, a reflection about their responsibility in relation to the researched contexts, considering that the collaborative research presumes the intervention of those involved in direction of their own transformation and, above all, to the researched situation. In this way, this work chose as a base for the research study, a continued professional development project in school, based on the relations between the researcher and professionals who work as director and pedagogical coordinator in state schools in the region of the Greater São Paulo. From the data collected in this context and with the discoursive analysis of the interactions, the collaborative research was discussed. As a foundation to the discussions, this study is based on the social-culturalhistorical activity theory (Vygotsky, 1934/2000, 1978/2000; Engeström, 1987, 1993, 1995, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005; Daniels, 1993, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2006, and others), on the discussions about qualitative methodology of research (Bredo & Feinberg, 1982; Cole & Knowles, 1993; Demo, 2004), on the theory of pedagogical discourse (Bernstein, 1971, 1990, 1993, 2000), on the role of the language discussed by the systemic functional linguistics (Halliday, 1973, 1985.1994; Halliday & Hasan, 1989, and others), and, basically, on the discussions about collaboration (Magalhães, 1990, 1992, 1994, 196, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2003; Brookfield & Preskill, 1999; Bray et al., 2000, and others). Parts of reports or transcriptions about meetings between researcher and participants were selected and analyzed, chosen amongst a set of 55 meetings. The intention of analyzing the excerpts was to understand how the methodological actions that characterize the collaborative research process became themselves the organizers of the participants learning. In relation to the transformationpermanence of the activity systems, the results show that its elements, when were worked by means of the actions of the expansive learning net, were redressed or partially redressed for researcher and participants. The results also show that the relationship developed between researcher and participants were redressed and reorganized by the actions of the collaborative research |
