Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Pierotti, Juliana Assef
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Sousa, Clarilza Prado de |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Formação de Formadores
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Educação
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21498
|
Resumo: |
This research is the analysis of the performance of Law students from a High Educational Institution based on public data made available by Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (Inep) on results obtained in the Students Performance National Exam (Enade) in 2006, 2009, 2012 and 2015.The qualitative and quantitative analysis is the comparison of Discrimination and Facilities Levels in Specific Component in more accurate and more wrong questions by Law students from this Institution compared to the total number of Law students who participated all over Brazil. It was also verified the curricular contentes with best and worst performance of these two groups. Covering documental analysis, results analysis and historical textualization of the emergence of intelligence tests and their influences for the creation of the Large Scale High Education Appraisal, this research aimed to indicate perspectives of the use of these informations for the planning and improvement process on the pedagogical proposal of a course, considering their respective students performance in the tests. We noticed that results are still being addressed in a regulatory manner and the creation of rankings is kept with a lack of aggregation in the formation proposal of new workers |
