Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Rodrigues, Alessandra Cristina Girotto |
| Orientador(a): |
Beznos, Clovis |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/18847
|
Resumo: |
In 2011, the Differentiated Regime of Contracts – DRC was instituted, applied exclusively to bids and contracts required to promote the 2013 Confederations Cup, World Cup 2014, the Olympics and the Paralympic Games in 2016. One of the main innovations of the DRC is the possibility to process the contracting through the Integrated Contracting regime, in which the responsibility for preparing the basic and executive projects will be attached to the one who will be future hired. The documentary research specifically addressed the integrated contracting Institute which has its most critical related to the absence of a basic project previously prepared to the bid for works and engineering services, whereas this could result in an affront to the principle of equality and less advantageous contracts for public sector. The study demonstrated that the Administration is not free from the responsibility to trace definitions and minimum standards guaranteeing the equality of the dispute. It also proved that the integrated contracting does not exempt the Administration to establish precise rules and fixed determinations regarding to the minimum quality and other attributes of the object to be performed, revealing that this instrument is not suitable to solve problems of disorganization or lack of management planning. The Contracting Differentiated Regime Law had its constitutionality questioned in two Unconstitutional Direct Actions – Adiņs proposals, one by the Partido da Social Democracia Brasileira – PSDB paired with the Democratas – DEM and the Partido Popular Socialista – PPS (ADIn n. 4.645) and the other by federal prosecutors (ADIn n. 4.655). Both of them alleged formal and substantive defects. The paper makes a detailed analysis of ADIns concluding that the Law does not violate any constitutional principle. The procedures were addressed to the main processes which are applied to integrated contracting, in which stand out: the reversal of the phases of qualification and judgment of price proposals; single appellate stage forecast; the offer bids in tenders whose purpose is works and engineering services; the secret budget; and others significant relevance elements |
