Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2011 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Carvalho, Antônio Donizeti de
 |
Orientador(a): |
Santos, Rogério da Costa |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
|
Departamento: |
Comunicação
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/4365
|
Resumo: |
The present searching has as objective accomplishing an analysis the way Brazil is retracted by the national press in a counterweight with the views received by the international publications, giving emphasizes to a mediatised diplomacy existent only as a refrain of the national press part, that presents the country as a midget claimant on the world stage. It is made an allowance the Brazilian acting in cases that reflect on these two spheres as news resource: Honduras politics crisis, the efforts made to help Haiti after the earthquake and the Iranian nuclear issue. Case that, in a certain way makes explicit the opposition between Brazil and The United States of America in the diplomatic area and become them public (or at least publishable) the new Brazilian attributions (or pretensions) on the rearrangement of the power in a global scale. The research advertises the following questionings: Why is Brazil presented on the international press (about certain celebration) in a different way that is certified on the national press (with a reiterated unworthiness)? And how far are these approaches tied to the image of the ex president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva? The epistemological theorist banks on theories that give sustentation to the journalistic utterance analysis under established restrictions by a communication agreement (Charaudeau), and the context this inserts - field where occurs an embattle between the plurilinguism and the momolinguism (Lazaratto), place of constant interference of the means, whose point of view tends to impose on the others in a disguised condition of the fourth power (Virilio, Trivinho).It is also appealed to the journalistic sociology (Neveu) in a way of demystifying the journalism as a democracy defender agent and consider the journalist power. The studied cases analysis still counts with an acting history of Itamaraty (its paradigms and interests), with a spotlight on the relations kept with the North-Americans. They are elected as corpus, publications from Folha de S. Paulo and from O Estado de S. Paulo, due to the newspaper range and representiveness, without; however ignoring other vehicles of publications in episodes that get visibility, because they will reinforce the necessary comparison. On the international coverage, they privilege news about this new Brazil (The Economist, Financial Times, Le Monde, El País, among others), as well as its resonance on the national coverage including then the aboveboard space for the president at that time |