Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Gonçalves, Carlos Alessandro de Mesquita |
| Orientador(a): |
Siqueira, João Hilton Sayeg de |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Língua Portuguesa
|
| Departamento: |
Língua Portuguesa
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/14292
|
Resumo: |
The objective of this dissertation is to scrutinize the argumentative construction used by the journalists responsible for the reviews published in Chart CDs of the Brazilian version of Rolling Stone. The magazine was created in the United States in the 1960s and it became one of the most prestigious musical segment in the world. The corpus of this study are aired over 2010 texts. Twenty reviews were selected because of their different lines of argument articulated in positive and negative assessments through stylistic and semantic nuances that reveal the personality of the authors who have been selected. They were examined under the light of Classical Rhetoric (Aristotle) and the New Rhetoric (Perelman & Tyteca). Some concepts of the Theory of Argumentation in Language (Ducrot) were adopted as theoretical support. The relationship between logos and pathos is the main category of analysis of this survey, whose interpretive methodology is based on quantitative to qualitative reviews of research material and results data. The first relevant finding is the fact that journalists have a good knowledge of the target of the publication, once the speech is proper to the audience, giving the prior agreement and revealing the reader profile. Although apodictic, dialectical and discursive reasoning fallacious mixed up all the time, there is a predominance of the first of these three. In relation to gender, we note a preponderance of epideictic, though the judiciary is quite used. Among the most frequent types of arguments are the ones based on the structure of the real and the underlying structure of reality. About the figures of speech, metaphor has a huge use. Comparisons and analogies also appear with intensity in part of the corpus. It is also essential to the realization that the journalistic review, which guides the reader with information and reviews on the latest music, breaks with the canonical structure of the academic review. The order of the overall plan of the genre is not respected in any text. With the exception of the technical file and the signature of the journalist, always at the beginning and end, respectively, the other constituent parts of the review are ordered without obeying any provision |
