Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Gomes, Rui Pereira
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Almeida, Lúcio Flávio Rodrigues de |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21065
|
Resumo: |
The present thesis has as theme the functioning of the participatory budgeting (PB) in Brazilian democracy, submitted to bourgeois economic, juridical-political and ideological dominance. From the theoretical basis used here, especially the work of Nicos Poulantzas: Political Power and Social Classes, texts by Décio Saes, and constitutive laws of the Brazilian bourgeois state that deal with popular participation through the PB, it was sought to identify the reasons why participatory practice does not transcend governments that has set it up and does not consolidate itself as a permanent state policy. The methodology used was qualitative, with bibliographic research technique of descriptive nature in secondary sources (theses and dissertations). Therefore, this research had its universe represented by doctoral dissertations and master dissertations elaborated by researchers in Brazil dealing with public policy (PP), which contents were confronted with aspects of the theoretical framework and with questions of a questionnaire elaborated from the same referential. The following results were obtained: I) The citizen's quality attributed by bourgeois law to the human element becomes an ideological condition of concealment of class division in Brazilian social formation and one of the mechanisms used by ruling classes that makes it difficult to mobilize masses, hindering a social adhesion to participatory policies such as PB; II) the juridical-political structure of the Brazilian State, whose right and bureaucracy are set to maintain a bourgeois order, directs the participation through the PB only to insignificant percentages of the total budget; III) the vast majority of PB experiences in Brazil were extinguished after the change of the government that implemented them. In addition to that, almost all the theses and dissertations mistakenly present the factors impending the continuity of de PB as the non-commitment of the managers or the lack of participatory culture of the population, and not as the structures of the bourgeois state that are constructed to guarantee the exploitation of class |
