Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Dantas, Lucas Silva
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Giovinazzo Júnior, Carlos Antonio
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: História, Política, Sociedade
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Educação
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/24627
|
Resumo: |
How do dissident bodies manage to resist and transgress racism, capacitation and cysheteropatriarchy in the school space? This is the problem question that guided this research, which aims to analyze the contributions brought by black, transgender, indigenous and disabled researchers on resistance and transgression in education. To carry out this research, the epistemic intersection methodology was created, based on the works of several thinkers, to analyze different epistemologies in order to discover their commonalities. A bibliographic survey was carried out, which culminated in the choice of eight theses and dissertations, developed in the last ten years, whose central point is the resistance of black, indigenous, LGBTQIAP+ and disabled people in education. These were analyzed using the method of categorization, following four established criteria: autobiographical trajectory, education, resistance/transgression practices and knowledge production. As theoretical reference for this work, the contribution of critical theorists, expressed in the works of Adorno (1995), Horkheimer (1985) and Marcuse (1964), and the analytical tool of intersectionality, brought by Akotirene (2019) and Crenshaw (2002) were adopted. Through this methodology, it was possible to cross the production of dissident authors, data and statistics as a way to map violence and oppression in the educational space, the intersectionality tool and the theoretical framework of the research, to thus connect all the points of this epistemic intersection, with multiple identities and different academic productions, in order to identify how dissident bodies manage to resist and transgress in the school space |
