Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Fidelis, Aline Marques
 |
| Orientador(a): |
João, Paulo Sergio
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/40871
|
Resumo: |
On current days, the opening of public companies to private capital has gained prominence in privatization processes in various sectors of Brazilian activities, and is contrasted with strike movements by employees opposed to changing the legal nature of public companies subject to privatization. In this context, this paper seeks to analyze the legitimacy of strikes by employees of public companies against privatization. The methodology used in this dissertation was logical-deductive, through an analysis of the Federal Constitution, the Consolidation of Labor Laws and other infra-constitutional legislation pertaining to the subject, as well as the fundamental principles relating to the subject and court precedents of the superior courts. It appears that when the strike is mobilized against a decision by the public authorities, and due to foreign matter of the employment contract, the strike against privatization can be characterized as a political strike in the strict sense and, consequently, can be considered abusive on account of the reason that deflagrated it, which do not find legitimacy in the legal and constitutional parameters of the contemporary Brazilian legal system |
