Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Ribeiro, Rodrigo Petronio
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Ponde, Luiz Felipe |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciência da Religião
|
| Departamento: |
Ciências da Religião
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/1891
|
Resumo: |
This study is an analysis of the work of Peter Sloterdijk Spheres from two main categories: religion and human evolution. The first category concerns the vocabulary and the theological and religious narratives that Sloterdijk uses to develop the theory of the spheres. The second consists an a theory of human evolution, that we can glean from esferologia. In this case, it is not thinking humanism and anti-humanism, but the hominismo, wherever, long-term approaches that scale the anthropos. For such an approach, I put the esferologia in dialogue with two central theories in investigations of evolutionary philosophy: the paradox comprehensive and a theory of emergency. There is a region of undecidability between linguistic and biological matrices that determine the anthropos. My hypothesis is that a theory esferologia is able to overcome this structural dichotomy, because it is not a dualistic or monistic, but dyadic philosophy. Resorted to other theoretical concepts and weaves them to the narrative of the spheres. Among them, theories about immunization systems, the general systems theory, the definition of the mediologia and the world-system, all described in the Introduction, where I list the theoretical tools of this work. I focused on the first volume of Spheres, which deals with the bubbles and the discrete processes of human inner. For Sloterdijk, humans are creatures ecstatic about which operates Abroad. The humanity of man consists precisely in infinite immunological effective mediums that anthropos created to achieve preserving immune to extra-human devastation and indifference of nature in relation to specie. In other words, the humanity of the human being lies precisely in its ability to create efficient systems immunologically against the crossing of extra-human forces, increasingly growing in modernity. The human being is an interior which operates on a pure Abroad. It is he who can, through domestication technologies, incorporating non-self to self, the sense of non-sense. Therein lies the long odyssey antropoesferológica species. This journey is an uninterrupted continuum that systematically describes the many concepts that man has of himself, that is, apart from being an emergency sapiens in the mundane scene, in biological terms, it consists in an unceasing caught itself and the ontological structure the anthropos. These images depicting the journey of several emerging fascinations proximity, in his paradoxical way of understanding are the only ways that the precarious anthropos willing to reveal their own humanity. I call these modes of figuration of the ontological structure of human being antropogemas. The spheres are narratives hominizadoras the itinerary of the species. The esferologia search through these antropogemas, reaches the region pre-ontologically understanding that underlies the human vision beyond the bivalent and monovalent, and the dualisms reductionisms and there by overcome internal antinomies present in all such systems |
