Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Palazzo, Camila |
| Orientador(a): |
Cesaretti, Mário Luís Ribeiro
 |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação nas Profissões da Saúde
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/9508
|
Resumo: |
The evaluation of higher education courses has been a widespread practice in many universities. This practice is important to inform managers of the course and teaching core improve on the quality of education that is being produced, the progress of students practices and the difficulties that may arise during development of the course. In the Medical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences of the Catholic University of São Paulo, the student evaluation in the course is performed by student participation in the Series / Teaching Committee (current Collegiate Course) and through an on-instrument line, completed in the virtual learning environment (Moodle) at the end of each module. The evaluation of higher education courses has been a widespread practice in many universities. This practice is important to inform managers of the course and the structural core teaching on the quality of education that is being produced, the progress of students practices and the difficulties that may arise during development of the course. In the course of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences of the Catholic University of São Paulo, the student course evaluation is done through student representation in Series / Curriculum Committee (current Collegiate Course) and through an on-instrument line, completed in the virtual learning environment (Moodle) at the end of each module. This instrument, Module Evaluation Questionnaire, has been underutilized over time and inquired about their lack of effectiveness could be related to the lack of formal fed back by the coordinators of the series or course. In this paper, we analyze the number of responses to the instrument, since its implementation in the virtual platform for integration of educational activities in 2010 and the number of responses in 2015, when a formal feedback session was introduced, online, provided by course coordination. Compared to historical averages of responses to the instrument and was carried out a qualitative analysis of these responses and open questions, with speech analysis, for categories of words. Concurrently, in 2015, a prospective analysis of accession was possible, since the introduction of online fed back to the students. We observed that this practice was not able to show greater involvement student to answer the online tool. The question is whether this is due to the short time offered or could be related to the lack of an evaluation culture. It should be noted that, over time, we observed no major changes in the assessment of closed questions, the vast majority maintaining positive concepts, however it was observed that there was a change of direction in the discourse on the open answers |
