Ação rescisória por violação da norma jurídica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2010
Autor(a) principal: Cramer, Ronaldo lattes
Orientador(a): Wambier, Teresa Celina Arruda Alvim
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/9068
Resumo: This work aims to study the main controversial aspects of rescission action on the basis of item V of art. 485 of the Civil Procedure Code or simply rescission action for violation of rule of law. To reach the central theme, I choose to analyze the assumptions of no place of rescission action: sentence and res judicata. Also examine, in general, the rescission action and all its assumptions relevant. Begin the work studying the sentence, their effects and their classification. Dedicate special attention to the new concept of the sentence and the thesis of sentence partial. Then, I analyze all the contours of res judicata, highlighting its constitutional protection and the controversy over what they espouse its relativity. After res judicata, study the rescission action, your chances of your required and procedure established by law. Examined the rescission action, I discuss the focus of this study: the rescission action for violation of the rule of law. In this part of the work, I exam the interpretation of the rule of section V and the most controversial features of this action. Finally, summarize the key ideas of this study