Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Gonçalves, Renata Cristina
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Lier-DeVitto, Maria Francisca |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/18898
|
Resumo: |
This research is about the incidence of the other / Other in the structure of language and the subject. Such question has been discussed in light of Interactionism in Language Acquisition, Language Clinics and Psychoanalysis. This work aims at proposing a discussion on the role of the other/Other in the first contact of infants with language, since this process may result in directions and deviations in the child‟s language construction. Interactionism states that the other (language instance built) is in the core of the understanding of speculation, which introduces the other as a (decisive) participant in the process which enables the contact with the language: the child speaks, because he/she speaks from the other‟s speech – in relation to the first position. The Other (la langue) is a third-party in the relationship child-other, that causes this separation, as, at that time, the child demonstrates resistance against adults‟ corrections, the existence of errors that characterize the second position. The third position is marked by a dominance of the relationship between the subject and their own speech marks– there are reformulations and self-corrections. The use of Language Clinics is justified by the fact that such clinics respond to “deviations” in the journey of language structuration, i.e., to language pathologies. In this sense, the Language Clinics responds to the “double demand” (ARAÚJO, 2006) imposed by their clinic, be it, (1) to the commitment to symptomatic speech in children and adults and (2) to a theory on language. With Psychoanalysis, I propose a discussion on the construction of the subject, with purposes to favor deeper reflections about the child, the other and their effects upon the process of acquisition and subjective structuration |
