Variabilidade comportamental e a seleção de uma sequência de baixa probabilidade inicial: comparando dois procedimentos

• Ano de defesa: 2012
• Autor(a) principal: Bitondi, Fernanda Rizzi
• Orientador(a): Gianfaldoni, Monica Helena Tieppo Alves
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia Experimental: Análise do Comportamento
• Departamento: Psicologia
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Variabilidade comportamental; Reforçamento dependente da frequência; Acoplamento; Seleção da sequência alvo; Tentativa discreta; Intervalo entre respostas
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Behavioral variability; Reinforcement frequency dependent; Yoked condition; Selection of the target sequence; Discrete trial; Interresponse interval
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA::PSICOLOGIA EXPERIMENTAL
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16687

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two procedures, Discrete Trial (DT) and Discrete Trial with Interresponse Interval (DT/IRI), on the production of behavioral variability in different conditions (directly reinforced and induced) and determine what condition, in each procedure, would facilitate the selection of an initial sequence of low probability. Were selected 18 college students with baseline performance measured by U-valeu, that was equal or less than 0,5. They were divided into the two procedures and subdivided into three groups with three participants (VAR, YOKE and CON). The task was to form images on the computer screen by pressing two keys (left and right) on lateral keyboards. The unit was four responses to the keys. In both procedures, a piece of the image, a tone and 0,5 seconds was used to reinforce sequences that attended the contingency s criterion, and a timeout of 1,0 second, if not. Only the DT/IRI had a 0,5 second interval after the first three responses of the sequence. The experiment had three phases. In Phase I, baseline, sequences was continuous reinforced (CRF). For two groups (DT- VAR and DT/IRI-VAR) in Phase 2, variability was direct reinforced on 15 sequences, mean that the less frequent and less recent sequence had more probability of been reinforced than the others, and a target sequence (less frequent sequence at baseline) was reinforced in CRF. In Phase 3, the distribution of reinforcement of the prior phase was yoked for the 15 sequences and another target sequence was reinforced in CRF. For the groups DT-YOKE and DT/IRI-YOKE, the phase s exposure was reversed, whereas in Phase 2 the distribution of reinforcement was yoked to the performance of the VAR groups. In groups DT-CON and DT/IRI-CON, only the target sequence was reinforced in both phases. The results showed that variability increased in the first session of Phase 2 for all participants. The DT-YOKE group showed the highest levels of variability within this procedure. In the DT/IRI procedure, this was true for the group DT/IRI-VAR. With regard to the selection of the target sequence the groups that had higher percentages of selection in all sessions were DT-CON and DT/IRI-VAR, respectively within each procedure. It was noted that both procedures produced the selection of the target sequence, but is seems that the use of IRI produced a more variable performance, when it was directly reinforced, allowing the selection of the target sequence to occur more rapidly