Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Edna Ribeiro dos
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Passarelli, Lílian Maria Ghiuro |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Formação de Formadores
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Educação
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21720
|
Resumo: |
This research investigates the assessment practices developed by teachers of an Elementary School of the Education Municipal Network of São Paulo, specially, the tools used for learning evaluation. The study had as general aim to investigate the evaluation tools used by the teachers; and as specific aims: to identify which evaluation tools are more often registered by the teachers in the Pedagogical Management System (PMS); to obtain information which may be applied in formations about the types of tools and its uses; to propose changes in the way of registering the assessment activities in the PMS. The references supporting this study were: Depresbiteris (1991), Depresbiteris and Tavares (2009), Gatti (2003), Haydt (2002), Santos Guerra (2007), Sousa (1991) and Vianna (2014). The research, with a qualitative approach, had as data collection procedures the semistructurated interview and the document analysis; and as subjects 11 professors which taught in this school in the year of 2017. The results highlight teachers’ declaration of several evaluation kinds, however, in the seeking of the more used tools, it was possible to imply that the exam shows up more often. It was also observed that in the way the evaluation activities suggestions are presented by the Pedagogical Management System – online registration device, it does not contribute for the knowledge and differentiation between these suggestions. Regarding the evaluation registers made by the teachers, it is possible to verify that the difference between the elements and fields presented is not clear, and these registers reveal this confusion, exposing in the same field the evaluation tools as well as the contents evaluated. Thus, the demands to be included in the formations include the knowledge about the assessment tools, its types and the criteria used, and the PMS itself |
