Conflitos religiosos e relações políticas no Pará (1930-1941)

• Ano de defesa: 2006
• Autor(a) principal: Mendes, Mayara Silva
• Orientador(a): D'Alessio, Marcia Barbosa Mansor
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Igreja Católica; política; censura; padre; Dom Lustosa; revolução de 30; Círculo Operário; Pará; Lustosa, Antonio de Almeida > 1886-1974; greja Catolica > Arquidiocese de Belem do Para > Arcebispo (1931-1941 : Almeida Lustosa); Igreja Catolica > Belem, PA > Historia > 1930-1941; Brasil > Historia > Revolucao, 1930
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Catholic Church; politics; censorship; priest; Dom Lustosa; 1930 revolution; working class circle; Pará
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7368

This disssertation aimed at discussing religious conflicts and political relations in Pará between 1930 and 1941 against the political background of the events of the 1930 s and of the tenure of Dom Antônio de Almeida Lustosa as bishop of Pará. In this period, some priests have positioned themselves against the political status quo, taking some attitudes that pleased neither the political bosses nor the local catholic hierarchy, which provoked a censure on them. Involved with electoral lawsuits or defalcation of catholic property, Father José Maria do Lago, Father José Foulquier, Father Leandro Pinheiro and Father Alcides Paranhos were forced to rethink their sacerdotal behavior towards society. Working with different kinds of official documents and newspapers, this work discusses the actions of such religious men and the positions and actions of the Catholic Church and of the local Governments concerning these attitudes, which were classified, by some politicians of that time, as petty politics.