Autoexecutoriedade do ato administrativo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2009
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Rodrigo Bordalo lattes
Orientador(a): Rocha, Silvio Luís Ferreira da
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8530
Resumo: This dissertation is a study on automatic, self-enforcement as an attribute of the administration acts and a means for the government to enforce its acts, dispensing with jurisdictional provision by the Judiciary. This paper investigates the principal legal aspects of self-enforcement, in particular the grounds and boundaries of said prerogative. This is a fundamental approach to the extent this matter raises the dialetic grounding the legaladministrative discipline governing the matter to the ultimate degree, as it entails a contraposition of administrative authority and individual liberties. Whilst Brazilian jurists have largely studied self-enforcement, and accepted it as a legitimate attribute, little has been said about it from the standpoint of the laws of other countries. These must not be overlooked, for the contraposition between Anglo-Saxon legal systems and Romano-Germanic legal systems provides diverse perspectives concerning administrative enforcement. The investigation of its constitutional foundation is a necessary requirement for an appropriate understanding of self-enforcement, as it sets the true role of legality vis-à-vis exercise of the prerogative. Establishing these premises allows for an understanding of the legal nature of self-enforcement and of the circumstances under which administrative execution is admissible Such as included in Brazilian public law, it begs examining the important role of nondisposability, as there are limits within which self-enforcement can be exercised, in particular in view of the principles of due process of law, adversary proceedings and full defense, as well as the principle of proportionality. Combining these aspects permits inferring the attribute of self-enforcement is subject to constraints limiting its applicability, such that whilst it may be true the administration may not dispense with it, it is also true that exercising the prerogative presents boundaries in the form of requirements that must be fulfilled