Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Lima, Nelci Vieira de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Bastos, Neusa Maria Oliveira Barbosa |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Língua Portuguesa
|
| Departamento: |
Língua Portuguesa
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/14375
|
Resumo: |
This thesis is based theoretically on Historiography Linguistics, discipline whose methods instituted by Koerner (1996, 2014) and Swiggers (2009, 2012), allow us to draw our object of study, namely: the linguistic thought expressed by men of the century sixteenth and twenty first century about the orthographic issues involving the Portuguese language within the established time clippings. Serve in the theoretical basis also the work of Auroux (2009), whose considerations aim at the historian's role specification of linguistic ideas, which in our view is consistent with our role of historiographers of linguistics. As to the objectives, that approach prompts us to the understanding of how to unveil not only the linguistic thinking, but also political and ideological positioning of the Renaissance grammarians of Portuguese, Joao de Barros and Fernão de Oliveira, as well as the Portuguese intellectuals the twenty-first century, Vasco Graya Moura and Antonio Emiliano - who demonstrated against the Orthographic Agreement of 1990 - about the linguistic and orthographic issues of language. Corroborates the justification for carrying out our work, the prospect of Schilieben-Langue (1993, p.138), who matter to the description of the history of argumentative communities in which they discuss issues that relate to languages. Thus we have the background of human intervention in the language, or rather the Linguistic Policy, and more specifically, the issue of orthographic standard that is recurrent in history. As a hypothesis, we suggest that there is a confluence between the linguistic thought of men of two seasons marked precisely by their political-ideological attitude towards the language and orthographic issues. Now, taking into account that our analysis is constructed in order to relate ideas and linguistic practices in its social, cultural, political and institutional context (Cf. Swigger, 2009), and that the methodology of historical writing, which involves aspects of categorization, deep categorization and well-structured exhibition which allows the past to be rebuilt according to the categorization of the historian (Swiggers, 2012, p. 43), we can say, regarding the conclusions reached, this research fits into the hall a much continuist historiography, than, exactly, discontinuist. Aside from that, we can also say that what we had achieved here is the realization of a two historiographical dialogue, however, marked by an intersection point, which is observed by the very parallelistic structure of the writing of the thesis. Getting marked, precisely at this point of intersection, the continuities in the linguistic thought of the men of the two centuries that have positioned themselves politically and ideologically, before the language, worrying about the orthographic issues existing at different historic moments. Finally, we conclude that these men demonstrated, above all, a sense of ownership linked to a nationalist defense of the Portuguese language |
