Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Dinamarco, Márcia Conceição Alves
 |
Orientador(a): |
Nazar, Nelson |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6097
|
Resumo: |
The society is a body in motion and the changes and the need of these changes to be implemented is a clamor of society. Not only the judges and the legislators are aware of this claim and is commonly said that the process has to be swift and effective, without forgetting that procedural rules can not be an obstacle to the fulfillment of the material right. Just with these eyes is that the jurisdiction was analyzed to perform of workers' claims when we are facing a judicial recovery and bankruptcy. The process as a tool available to society to ensure the peace and dignity of the human person, has all his technique and rules, but can not be an obstacle to substantive law itself and neither stop to analyze the claim (merit) without taking into consideration all the facts and figures and apply the rules so that a right overlaps the other and therefore the rule of complementarity and the principle of proportionality must always be applied |