Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Camargo, Alessandro Mancio de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Santaella, Lucia |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Tecnologias da Inteligência e Design Digital
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21752
|
Resumo: |
Agricultural activity takes advantage of several new technologies, whose structural and technical advances have been expressed since the last century, for example, through chemical fertilizers, transgenic crops, digital code, multimedia, interactive mobility. This thesis outlines in detail this process through historical records such as those of the great acceleration (STEFFEN et al., 2015), a series of innovations that since 1950 have been driving the growing role of cognitive and technological power in the design of the future and that already leaves an effective geological mark on the planet, identified as Anthropocene. Therefore, this thesis revisits the rural origin of the great acceleration and discusses how it repeatedly presents itself in disruptive technologies in digital agrosystem as described, among others, by Massruhá et al. (2014) and Bernardi et al. (2014) of Embrapa Informática and Embrapa Instrumentação, respectively. This work adopts the technography proposed by Jansen and Vellema (2011), which is a method that balances the technical, biophysical, cultural, economic and cognitive dimensions seen in agriculture, as a methodological strategy to solve the following problem: In what way do several elements and dynamics (climate, soil, machines, farmers, digital code) have their relations and exchanges affected by ubiquitous connectivity? As a conclusion, this thesis shows that the digital agrosystem increasingly encourages and rewards relational logics aimed at the potential of profiting from rural knowledge rather than the ability to produce food. Thus, both abductive-inductive and deductive agrosystems – such as the fuzzy Javanese domestic garden and Gotham Greens technological urban agriculture, for example – must be equitably linked to complete, deep and interactive networks to meet and understand ecosystem needs in order to enhance cooperation between the different modes of relations and cognitive exchanges existing in the field. This requires the universalization of the essential skills that allow integration into digital agrosystem in a reliable and transparent way |
