Recurso de revista e a razoável duração do processo

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Cavalcante, Rafael Ferraresi Holanda
• Orientador(a): Manus, Pedro Paulo Teixeira
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Recurso de revista; Processo do trabalho; Requisitos de admissibilidade dos recursos em geral
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Review appeal; Labor procedure law; Admissibility requirements of general resources
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/19704

The review appeal to the Superior Labor Court – TST, to have their actually tried merit, needs to be known. As it is an extraordinary instance it was created prerequisites for this knowledge. To review appeal apply generic appellate assumptions, belonging to all resources, and the more specific the measure appropriateness. As generics are: collapsing, representation, preparation and timing. Specific assumptions have the jurisprudential harvest, normative, legalistic and constitutional, provided for in art. 896 of the Labor Code. So it remains therefore direct the course of this work, for specific assumptions (= art. 896 of the Labor Code) of admissibility of review appeal. Or more simply, the cases of "appropriateness" of this resource in order to be able to assess how much there is of influence on the analysis of requirements for labor courts, especially the TST, to ensure the protection and effectiveness of the fundamental right called " reasonable length of proceedings "(art. 5, LXXVIII, of the Federal Constitution)