Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Nannini, Tamara Ambra Ciorniavei
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Lins, Robson Maia
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/32550
|
Resumo: |
Inspired by the North American writ of error, the extraordinary appeal was granted as an important instrument of interpretative uniformity and control of the legal order by the Federal Supreme Court, currently reflecting an important instrument in the exercise of the diffuse constitutionality control performed by the Court. Due to the "extraordinary appeal crisis", resulting from the disproportionality between the judgment capacity of eleven ministers and the volume of appeals daily distributed before the Supreme Court from all over the national territory, the movement for objectifying of the extraordinary resource, and the approximation between the models of concentrated and diffused control. With the advent of the Code of Civil Procedure in 2015, the ordinary legislator attributed true binding effectiveness to judgments handed down under the rite of repetitive extraordinary appeal, from which the rule of precedent derives. The aim of this research is to analyze, in the light of current legislation, bibliographical and jurisprudential research, the link between the Federal Public Administration and the thesis signed by the Federal Supreme Court in the performance of the binding and exclusive activity of tax assessment |
