O prequestionamento da questão de fato

• Ano de defesa: 2022
• Autor(a) principal: Ranña, Leonardo Fernandes
• Orientador(a): Wambier, Teresa Arruda Alvim
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Direito processual civil; Questão de fato; Questão de direito; Recurso especial; Recurso extraordinário; Admissibilidade recursal; Prequestionamento; Embargos de declaração; Reexame de fatos e provas; Valoração de provas; Qualificação jurídica do fato
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Civil procedural law; Fact issue; Legal issue; Special appeal; Extraordinary appeal; Appealability; Pre-questioning; Motion for clarification; Review of facts and evidence; Evidence assessment; Legal Classification of the Fac
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/30288

Although there is no provision in item III of articles 102 and 105 of the Federal Constitution of 1988 that the facts and evidence cannot be tackled by the Superior Court of Justice during trials of extraordinary appeals, the simple re-examination of facts and evidence of the case proves incompatible with the constitutional hypotheses of the applicability of these appeals and with their main functions, They are: (i) protect the objective legal order (nomophylactic); (ii) standardize the understanding of the legal norm (standardizing); (iii) preserve the fair resolution of the concrete case (dikeological); and (iv) establish parameters for the interpretation of the law that must be followed by the other authorities of the judicial branch (paradigmatic). There is an argument based on the literal interpretation of Precedents n. 279/STF and Precedent No. 07/STJ mentioning that the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Court of Justice must be totally removed from the facts and evidence of the case in the decisions of extraordinary and special appeals. In spite of being initially consistent with the nature and purpose of this type of appeal, it is misconceived from an in-depth analysis of the topic. The aforementioned precedents, by explicitly referencing the prohibition of reexamination of evidence in the strict law appeals (extraordinary and special appeals) convey a much more complex meaning than what can be taken from their wording, if analyzed superficially. Despite apparently different, fact-in-issue and legal issue are often confused since both are necessary to form the legal phenomenon. In face of the impossibility of totally dissociating fact and law, pre-questioning - considered herein synonymous with "decided cause"- proves to be a constitutional requirement. The present study aims to analyze the requirements and limits to the examination of factual matter both in deciding appealability and in deciding extraordinary and special appeals through the pre-questioning approach