Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Ferreira, Vinicius Santos
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pereira, Maria Eliza Mazzilli
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia Experimental: Análise do Comportamento
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/24279
|
Resumo: |
The question that guided this work was: are Brazilian and American therapies that claimed they were based on Behavior Analysis compatible? To answer it, this thesis analyzed at the philosophical and conceptual levels the TAC, the Brazilian representative, and the ACT, representative of the American third wave movement, in order to: (a) characterize these psychotherapies according to the philosophical and conceptual analysis model proposed; (b) identify the convergences and divergences between these psychotherapies; and (c) verify the compatibility of these psychotherapies with Behavior Analysis and radical behaviorism. The first published ACT manual and a set of TAC texts by Banaco, Meyer and Zamignani were selected for analysis; these were read, and significant passages were selected based on the following analytical structure: (a) the analysis of the psychotherapy models occured in the levels of philosophical and conceptual analysis; (b) each level was composed of different variables; and (c) the analysis of the variables was guided according to key questions. The results and discussion were presented for each of the five variables analyzed: philosophical and scientific basis, explanatory model, truth criterion, positioning on the question of mind and body and terminology. In the final considerations it was concluded that: the TAC was considered compatible with the Behavior Analysis with respect to the explanatory model and the positioning on the question mind and body, and there was an absence of positioning in relation to its criterion of truth and their terminology; ACT proved to be compatible with Behavior Analysis in relation to the explanatory model and monist positioning, and incompatible with respect to its a-ontological positioning, truth criterion and terminology. Thus, it is argued that the integration between ACT and TAC may incur theoretical eclecticism by overlapping different philosophical and conceptual systems |
