Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Hernandes, Bruna Molina
 |
Orientador(a): |
Pizzol, Patricia Miranda |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5819
|
Resumo: |
The present study has the aim of analyzing the possibility of reverting proving obligations in food related claims in the current legal system based on the study of constitutional principles and the similarities existed between factual and juridical situations involving consumers and furnishers taken from the Consumer Code in order to collect elements to formulate a theory for reverting prove obligation in food related claims. Firstly, it will be briefly studied important aspects of the general theory of prove, such as the concept and finality of prove, its object, the principles it involves, passing through the analysis of indications, costumes and presumptions around the theme. After that, it will be studied the legal concept of food, its general notion, characteristics and procedural rites. Finally, entering more specifically the theme of the study, there will be treated the revertion of prove obligations in general, the applicable theories, beside the study of the Consumer Code in order to analyze the possibility of inverting prove obligations in food related claims combined with the analysis of the applicable principles, the similarities existed between consumer and feeding in terms of rights and other characteristics. The study will be concluded by the presentation of the procedure to be applied for reverting proving obligations in food related claims |