Significações de família por profissionais da proteção social básica: uma pesquisa em Unidade do CRAS do Sul do Maranhão

• Ano de defesa: 2023
• Autor(a) principal: Macedo, Péricles de Souza
• Orientador(a): Rosa, Elisa Zaneratto
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Social
• Departamento: Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Significações de família; Proteção social básica; Psicologia sócio-histórica; Perspectiva protetiva; Perspectiva familista
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Meanings of family; Basic social protection; Socio-historical Psychology; Protective; Perspective; Familistic perspective
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA::PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/40024

This master's thesis has as general objective to analyzemeanings of family by professionals of basic social protection. The research is theoretically and methodologicallyguidedbySocio-HistoricalPsychologyandisjustifiedbythescarcity of studies inthefieldof socialpsychologythat focusonthetheme,aswellasbythe centralityof thefamilyinsocial assistanceactions.Toachievetheoutlinedobjective, three interviewswereconductedwithworkersofaCRASintheinteriorofMaranhão, in the format of aconversationcircle.Methodologically, theanalysisusedNucleiof Meaning. Intheresults, themeaningofomittedfamilyappearsfrequently.Despitethe criticisms of the notion of structured family, this idea still persists andguides the practices of professionals who work in this field of social protection. Another phenomenonthat frequentlyappearsconcernsthecontradiction:difficultyofadherence of families to social assistance services versus lack of objective conditions that permeate thispolicy.Thephenomenonof social inequalityappearedasanimpassein the work developed with the families, not being recognized as centrality in the conditions facedbytheworkof theseprofessionals.Thedatapoint totheneedforan advance in the socio-assistance praxiswith regard toworkingwith families. It is understoodthatthemeaningsconstitutetheprofessionalpractices,infunctionofwhatis shown to be fundamental, for the qualification of this public policy, to point to possibilities of praxis that consider the real families that arriveat thedevices. The tensionbetweenaprotectiveperspectiveandafamilyperspectiveremains inpolitics andneedstoberecognizedinordertoproducenewsyntheses.