Solidariedade como princípio constitucional e o humanismo necessário

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2015
Autor(a) principal: Ishikawa, Erica Tais Ferrara lattes
Orientador(a): Alvim, Marcia Cristina de Souza lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/6787
Resumo: Is this doctoral thesis, under the philosophy of Law and the State, which aims to bring a brief review of the man and the law; the evolution of both the needs that arise from the dynamics of current relationships; the finding that the inertia of the man shows his real selfish concept, and the transition of natural rights into positive law as the legal model willing to safeguard fundamental rights. It is proposed, the present work, to affirm that solidarity is not only as belonging to the ethical or moral demesne, but that, after his provision in the Federal Constitution of 1988, it became legal rule positively valued by constitutional principle. Therefore the need for identification of solidarity or as a rule or a principle in law. The intercultural dialogue is also inserted as a way of realization of the principle of solidarity, because, aim at the protection and realization of fundamental rights. In this sense, the European Union is the best example of diverse cultures, religions and Constitutions, which considers all its inhabitants as citizens, particularly characterized by free movement of person. Given this fundamental right, will be evaluated as the European Court concretize the principle of solidarity provised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In Brazil, will be verified the application of the principle of solidarity by the decisions of the Supreme Court and it usage translates into a necessary humanism by all jurisdictions