Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Cornélio, Raphael Lima Lemes
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Gitelman, Suely Ester
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/39286
|
Resumo: |
The theme proposed for the present work aims to demonstrate that the extension of the Constitutional protection against automation, exposed in article 7, XXVII of the CF is not enough to safeguard the labor rights that are impacted by technology. To achieve this goal, the evolution of the term technology will be exposed over time, a term that is metamorphosed and molds itself, to the same extent that it influences the needs of contemporary man. Later, we will point out the impacts caused by technology in labor relations. In sequence, we will analyze whether such impacts caused by technology are part of the current protective scope of article 7, XXVII of the CF, through a study of the existing infraconstitutional legislation. Subsequently, a topic that generates debate in the doctrine is about the effectiveness of fundamental rights in employment relations, and about the discussion between the lack of effectiveness of the article studied, in relation to the position that it defends to be the same self-applicable, under penalty of transforming the Constitution in dead letter. This culminates in a reinterpretation of protection in the face of automation to fit today's needs |
