Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Gomes, Geisa Rodrigues
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Vicentin, Maria Cristina G. |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Social
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/17004
|
Resumo: |
With the Federal Constitution, ECA and SINASE, there is legal basis for social educative action along with the authors of infractions acts, according to a ensure rights practice. However, it is not observed in the execution of this social educative measure that substantial progress toward overcoming a repressive-correctional model is being implemented. One of the challenges is the change of mentality among all sectors of the childcare system in accordance with mentioned laws. With this point of view, and in the Fundação CASA (Foundation Center of Socio-educative Atendment to the Teenager) context, this study presents and discusses an experience of the research author in forming socio-educationers in two detention centers. Through the method of Restorative Justice, more specifically Peace Circles, we have tried to influence change in the ideological perspective of the civil servants, whom work in the socio-educative practice. This experience will be analyzed from the theoretical contributions of Restorative Justice, under the concepts of conflict, participation and justice in three conflictive situations that stood out in this training process: 1) The introduction of an approach to the adolescent model named Centro de Convívio Social (Social Interaction Center); 2) Speeches of officials about the way they relate to the teenagers; and 3) Riots occurring in both Service Centers. Although it was not possible to complete the training, this specific experience suggests that, with the help of experts in Restorative Justice, supported by research and evaluation processes, Restorative Justice when directed to socioeducators can qualify the socio-educative action. Moreover, considering the risks of this proceeding to be distorted to disciplinary purposes, especially when used with adolescents in a coercive context as an internment center, Restorative Justice directed the officials, may be an interesting alternative, if accompanied by changes in institutional culture as a whole. In this experiment we were able to point out, among other gains, the possibility to turn the care and punitive approaches into an opportunity of collective reflection for a ensure of rights and transdisciplinary practice, in which young people are no longer seen as victims or victimizers, and start to be recognized as people of rights and responsibilities |
