Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2007 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Xisto, Daniela Taibo Ribeiro
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Critelli, Dulce Mara |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia
|
| Departamento: |
Filosofia
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11753
|
Resumo: |
This study has as subject to distinguish and to approximate two ways, mutually unyielding, of thought and speech: the mythos and the logos. To make such distinction, we leave from the recognition of some of the distinctive characteristics of the mythos and of the logos in the origins of the occidental thought, because it is from there that germinate the poetic and philosophical expressions of thinking and of the word. It is for two of these expressions at the present time that we returned our attention, in the sequence: Martin Heidegger's philosophical speech and Clarice Lispector's poetic prose. Once recognized what distinguish them, we looked for possible approaches among what says the logos of Heidegger and the mythos of Lispector concerning a same subject: the condition of being of the men. The elaboration of this study happens in two parts. In the first, it is observed, initially, what belong to these speeches that are the mythos and the logos in their original appearances in archaic and old Greece, respectively. In a second moment, of this first part, we accompanied what tell us Martin Heidegger and Clarice Lispector concerning the property of their respective ways of thinking and saying conceptual and imaginative. The second part of the study observes the understandings, many times close to each other, of Heidegger and Lispector, about the way of being of the men. It is important to emphasize that this study is all guided for the attempt of letting Martin Heidegger s and Clarice Lispector s speeches to be shown, in relation to their peculiar ways of understanding and expression, and in relation to their comprehension concerning the human. Once, what we intended is, respecting the differences of them, to mention for the fertile dialogue between mythos and logos, among the poetic and philosophical speeches, trying to understand a subject. Because of that, we established punctual approaches among the referred comprehension on the human, going of what is said by the Heidegger s logos to the encounter of what tell us the Lispector s mythos. In the final considerations, we move through the confluence of such comprehension, in observing what is particular to the men |
