Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Fachini, Sônia Regina Victorino
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Lier-DeVitto, Maria Francisca |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
|
| Departamento: |
Lingüística
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13623
|
Resumo: |
This paper presents a reflection on the position of the investigator before ethics, method and analysis undertaken in studies that involve subject and language. The idea that language can be measured has allowed researchers, even with language training, to assume a position that empowers them to define in advance what will be accepted as "right" or "wrong", eliminating, thus, the life of language, its richness and unpredictability, aspects that could not be disregarded in relation to a subject and the language that inhabits him. The argument referred to in this thesis takes side of the subject and takes on a conception of language away from that which assumes it is independent of the speaker and subject to controlling and measuring. Due to previous work done based on Neuroscience, something on the order of the singular, the heterogeneous could be "heard" by this researcher. This "clean singular in the statistical treatment of results (obtained through the construction of controlled instruments - standardized tests) put pressure by suspending the comfort zone of the investigator, supported by the ideal of science. Therefore, this paper turns the focus to the position of the investigator before the language and to whom conceives it as science. Issues related to ethics, methods and analyzes were addressed. It is important to say that the affiliation to the "Acquisition, Pathology and Language Clinic" group led by Maria Francisca Lier-DeVitto at LAEL PUCSP- opened space for a reflection that involves a scientific thinking about language, a reflection which may include the treatment of symptomatic outputs. This meeting enabled a discussion about science, about experimentation and experiments, issues worked on this thesis |
