Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Carlos Renato Lonel Alva |
| Orientador(a): |
Balera, Wagner |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23700
|
Resumo: |
This masters’ dissertation claims to see, through the legal order, a relation of reciprocal complementarity between the closed private pension and the health care. The aim is to demonstrate that the Social Security System – very well taught by Teacher Wagner Balera, in an oeuvre that bears that name – is constitutionally so cohesive that allows admitting an interdependence between the closed private pension activity and health care activity, for the purpose of increasing the participant's social protection. A brief framework of the Social Security System will be done so that the relation of the ventilated institutes in this study be corroborated. Therefore, the dissertation's challenge is to demonstrate the legal pertinence of this relation, in light of Article 194 of the Federal Constitution, withal considerating the human being's welfare "participant" of the pension benefit plans or "beneficiary" of health care plans. The work was elaborated starting from the right post, i.e., from the current legal order, with doctrine analysis, applying the dialectical logical reasoning methods and hypothetical-deductive in the course of scientific research, beyond the legal hermeneutics itself to interpret the legal standards. The jurisprudence was not considered because there is no existing formation of this theme. In fact, the relation between the activities of closed private pension and supplementary health has not yet given rise controversy to the point of taking advantage of Judiciary for resolution purposes. The conclusion will prove that the reasoning of concluding by the reasonableness of those two activities' execution due to the affinity of both was correct, in the light of the interest from the benefit plans' participant |
