Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Correa, Rafael Motta e
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Lopes, João Batista |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso embargado |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/22631
|
Resumo: |
The purpose of this thesis is to demonstrate the importance of legal facts when selecting special and extraordinary appeals representative of a repetitive controversy. Legal facts are essential elements of any legal rule, since there is no right without a fact, value and rule. The legal fact is the normative hypothesis of the rule and, in the case of judicial precedents, the normative hypothesis that is extracted from the material (essential) facts of the concrete case tried as a judicial precedent. The application or distinguishing of the rule of a judicial precedent (ratio decidindi) is accomplished through techniques that use legal facts as their primary tool. Repetitive special and extraordinary appeals are judicial precedents by political-legislative choice (art. 927, III, of CPC / 15). Given the constitutional limitation for incursion in the matter of facts in the special and extraordinary appeals, we present parameters and grounds for selecting the special or extraordinary appeal that best represents the repetitive controversy, taking into account the legal facts of the specific claim. We demonstrate the importance of having the legal facts underlying the repetitive law controversy detailed in the initial decision of the High Courts and, subsequently, in the sample judgment of the merits of the repetitive appeal |
