Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Costa, Marcelo Luiz da
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Passetti, Edson
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/24585
|
Resumo: |
This research addresses the working situation in power relations in Brazilian society, from a libertarian perspective, between the end of the Estado Novo and the 1960s, when the civilmilitary coup changed the political-institutional devices towards the establishment of a dictatorship. In the historiographical and sociological discourse about this period, the position of the popular classes is seen, on the one hand, as the result of a historical evolution marked by industrialization, urbanization and the development, not without setbacks, of liberalism and democracy; on the other hand, the proletariat is seen as the late element whose presence becomes part of the political game of the institutions of the Brazilian State, showing mobilization and indicating possibilities for the formation of a class consciousness, second Marxist postulates. However, the anarchist movement, through the newspapers Ação Direta, A Plebe, O Libertário and Dealbar, had criticized the working and popular condition, denouncing the dissipation of their revolt, the capture of their energies in the institutionalization of workers' struggles for state unionism , as well as its integration in a tutelary relationship, either with the Communist Party leaders and other sectors called 'progressives', expressing the so-called left and right populisms, or through the liberaldemocratic institutions themselves, with their practices and values – mainly in elections. However, what the versions of historiography and interpretations of Brazilian education evade is the experience of the autonomous and independent labor movement, organized in anarchist molds, which preceded the establishment of the Vargas regime and which functioned as a flow of libertarian life and resistances, which were never captured by the oppressive structures of Brazilian society. hierarchical and capitalist asylum. With this, the aim is to expose notes and considerations about the criticisms made by anarchists between the 1940s and 1960s, especially to democracy and the working class condition and, in a complementary way, contribute to a more detailed understanding of anarchist practices of the period and less dichotomous in the history of Brazil |
