Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Silva, Carlos Antônio da |
Orientador(a): |
Souza, Ney de |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Teologia
|
Departamento: |
Teologia
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/18335
|
Resumo: |
Conforms the catholic doctrine, the bishop of the Church of Rome, as the successor of Peter, occupies a position of authority and final responsibility in the universal Church. This responsibility received dogmatic confirmation in the constitution Pastor aeternus of Vatican Council II. The terms used in Vatican Council II favored the understanding of craft primatial second the model of monarchy absolute, which became the current interpretation in the Catholic Church. However, the advance of the theology, the Vatican Council II and the ecumenical commitment of the Church brought elements difficult to reconcile with this understanding. This works intends, through analysis of the conciliar text and its sources, define if the understanding of the primacy as absolute monarchy is necessary, or if the dogma of Vatican I can be understood in another way. |