Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2009 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Melo, Wanderson Fabio de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Rago Filho, Antonio |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em História
|
| Departamento: |
História
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13196
|
Resumo: |
The present work study the production of Roberto Campos, and Fernando Henrique Cardoso through immanent analysis. The hypothesis is that Roberto Campos expressed the position of financial and commercial sectors of the Brazilian bourgeoisie. While Fernando Henrique Cardoso of the groups represented industrial capitalists. In this case, the thesis rising up about the four chapters. At first, we study the involvement of Cardoso and Campos in institutional politic, the making their politics campaign to Congress, their programs, and the relation of social class into this. Still in this chapter, iscussing the intellectual of Roberto Campos in the brazilian economy after the Second World War. And Fernando Henrique Cardoso s in the making "restricted marxism" in the Social Sciences in Brazil. The second chapter, will discuss the position of Campos and Cardoso about the politic movement by "Eleições Diretas-Já," the social class and political forces at the end of military dictatorship and change of the form of bourgeois power of autocracy. In the third chapter, passes to the study of elaborations on capitalism present in the author s work. It point out Roberto Campos s agreement with the genesis of capitalism since of averice, but besides, the process to modern at the moment from subordination to financial foreing capital. About the point of view of Cardoso, we can observe a concept of slavery-mercantile capitalism and the society "patriarchal patrimonial" to explain the social trajectory and economic of coutry and to defend the modernization. It points out the different between the authors, but we can note the theoric nucleus in the work of Max Weber sociologist. To finish, the fourth chapter analyzes the propositions on the Computer Law of Brazil in 80 s of the twentieth century in the Senate debate. The sources for this research were the articles of press, in scientific journals, books and speech s Congress |
