Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2005 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Pereira, Julio Neves
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Strôngoli, Maria Thereza de Queiróz Guimarães |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Língua Portuguesa
|
| Departamento: |
Língua Portuguesa
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/14213
|
Resumo: |
The self-help genre was analyzed in a corpus of three books in order to describe its semiotic functioning. The analysis was conducted at a discursive level. Its approach is based on the interaction between Greimas and Bakhtin s points of view reflected on the following principles: every discourse arises from the generative trajectory of meaning, in which structural shifts take place; discourse and social formation linguistically articulate through the act of utterance; in the text writing process, both internal and external factors influence the genre development process; every act of communication (persuasion) takes place through a genre. Thus, the relationship between enunciator and addressee was observed by describing the rhetoric/discursive procedures of question and particular case, as well as the projection of the act of utterance by observing how the discourse behaves based on the criteria of subjectivity and objectivity using the shifting-out process. Hence, it was found, on one hand, that in the relationship between enunciator and addressee: (1) the discourse tends to be monologic and monosemic; (2) the ethos that is embodied in the discourse is that of a firm, absolute subject who holds and gives the truth; (3) persuasive strategies (rhetoric question and particular case: illustration and model) construct how subjects act and are, who in this discourse are seen as the despot (absolute owner of knowledge) and the disciple (ignorant subject), in this process, there is a removal of the addressee s voice; (4) in the visual presentation of the cover, semi-symbolization procedures (persuasive strategy) are second to the symbolization procedure, which reveals that this discourse is highly predictable and full of stereotyped beliefs and values. On the other hand, it was found that in the projection of the act of utterance: (5) as a thematic discourse, there are figures that cover it partially; (6) there is an omniscient narrator who have knowledge and a narratee who have no knowledge; (7) the relationship between these actants in the discourse is structured around the promise of change in cognitive state (no knowledge  knowledge); (8) the discourse tends to be prescriptive (must do) and programmatic (know to do); (9) there is an interchange of shifting-out (débrayage énoncif/énonciatif): sometimes the discourse is subjective, sometimes objective; (10) in this discourse, there is a tendency to create the effect of dissolving the oppositions between science and religion. This discursive configuration is a step towards further studies, which may, based on this and previous studies, seek a discursive configuration that makes the genre specificity known |
