Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Pereira, Marli Amélia Lucas
 |
Orientador(a): |
André, Marli Eliza Dalmazo Afonso de |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Psicologia da Educação
|
Departamento: |
Psicologia
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16177
|
Resumo: |
It is known that the Literacy Grant Project aims at the articulation between university and school, and that specific knowledge is required in order to attend its demands. Within this scenario, the present research had as objectives: to analyze the reasons for entering the program and the evaluation made from the different participants; to identify the necessary knowledge so as to attend the demands of the Project. This is a qualitative research and with discussion group and semi-structured interview as data collection procedures. The discussion groups involved researcher undergraduates from three Higher Education Institutions (IES) from São Paulo State. The interviews were made with the teachers from the public schools who had the researcher undergraduates in their classes, and with the Professors from the IES who guided these undergraduates. The analyses of the interviews and the group discussion data were made having in consideration the discussions by André (1983,2013) and Lüdke and André (2013). The material was divided into parts, and then those parts were related trying to identify tendencies and relevant patterns. In the first phase of organization, the topics of the interviews with the teachers, guiding professors, and the discussion groups with the researcher undergraduates were gathered. After the grouping of topics and themes was made, the next phase was to systematize the categories. From all that was heard from the participants of this research, it is understood that the Literacy Grant Project corroborates with the idea of teaching formation present in Nóvoa (2008, 2009), Marcelo (2010), Zeichner (2010), and with the defense of a professional formation aimed at the school context, in a collaborative work perspective, found in Vaillant and Marcelo (2012). It also corroborates with Charlot´s (2000, 2013) perspective who highlights the important relation with knowledge and Tardif´s (2009, 2010), who places the teacher´s knowledge in the interface between the individual and the social levels, and who defends that the teachers are subjects of knowledge and they build specific knowledge to their occupation. It can be said that the Literacy Grant Project has positive value for the participants of this research, once the majority of the statements given by them are positive |