Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Veras, Robson Pedro
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pissarra, Maria Constança Peres |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20785
|
Resumo: |
The aim of this study is to demonstrate how the concept of freedom prescribed by Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant moved from the state of nature to the civil state thus constituting certain ethics as heritage. The justification for this study is the premise of terms from the XVIII century on a certain modification in the philosophical locus referent to the form of perceiving freedom. The main issue so to speak here presented demonstrates a form of perception of the free man regarding their action. It is in the autonomy of the being who acts the Division between the primitive and the civil man. While the civil man acts moved by moral imperatives (categorical imperative), the natural man has their actions unfolded for their mere survival and because of this, among other possibilities, they can have fear as an inclination. Therefore, the result is pointed out as the prerogative that freedom in a civil state is prescribed as an apodictic flow of the general willingness which will invariably define the course of action of those who join the same society. The civil liberty abandons a puerile form of action and replaces it with the prerogative of protection of those who accept the guardianship of the State. Men now seek the collective well-being as the greater need in their actions |
