Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Silva, Renata Gonçalves da
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Gitelman, Suely Ester |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/22889
|
Resumo: |
The present work has as its objective to perform a critical analysis on the predominance of collective negotiations with regard to Labour Law, a topic inserted in the flexibilization of labour rights framework, facing the current Brazilian trade union model. The aim of the research is to argue about the relationship between representation institutes, representativeness and the flexibilization of labour rights and about how a little representative trade union model can be determinant to the undermining of labour rights, disguised as a supposed flexibilization as to better adapt relationships in labour to the new business scenery. Given that, a study on the Brazilian trade union model and its contradictions will be performed, discussing, from the perspective of the International Labour Organization, the trade union freedom and its diverse dimensions, in order to understand if the recognition of a full trade union freedom would strengthen trade unions and would make them representative entities. Therefore, facing the premise that Brazilian trade unions end up weakened by their own trade union model, it is necessary to verify if the recognition of collective negotiations as a suitable instrument to make labour rights flexible is valid to the current trade union system or if it would be more accurate to reshape the system itself in order to, afterwards, recognize the strength of deals and collective conventions for labour |
