Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2011 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Sugayama, Ariane Mieco
 |
Orientador(a): |
Zanotto, Mara Sophia |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
|
Departamento: |
Lingüística
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13545
|
Resumo: |
This work, which is within the area of Applied Linguistics, aims at: 1. investigating social practices of reading, that is, the reading mediation as cultural action (TEIXEIRA COELHO, 1989) and the group think-aloud (ZANOTTO, 1995; 2008), intending to search for theoretical-methodological convergences, in order to contribute to a paradigmatic change in teaching the reading of literary texts in the classroom, as well as to the reader s training; and 2. analyzing my own practice, through research-action (KINCHELOE, 1997), something which was carried out during the interaction with my female students, i.e., how I answered them and how they answered me. The questions I tried to answer were: 1. what are the theoretical-methodological differences and similarities between the reading mediation as social action and the group thinkaloud?; 1.1. in which aspects each of these practices contributes to a paradigmatic change in teaching the reading of literary texts in the classroom?; 1.2. in which sense these social practices of reading (BLOOME, 1983; STREET, 1984; 1993) can complete each other and enrich the mediator and students performance, based on the knowledge on how the questions emerge in my interaction with the students?; 1.3. in which sense these social practices of reading can contribute to training the reader of literary texts? This research has a qualitative design (BORTONI-RICARDO, 2008), a critical interpretive approach (MOITA LOPES, 2006; FIDALGO, 2006), and the data were analyzed through the interpretation of these reading practices, considering the meanings developed by the social subjects. The theoretical framework is related to reading, literacy, literature, metaphor, teaching-learning, and inquiry theories. The instruments for data generation were: 1. the group think-aloud; 2. reading diaries (MACHADO, 1998); and 3. group interview (FLICK, 2009). The subjects involved were the female students from the Project Reading Mediators Training, having the researcher as mediator. The results obtained revealed: 1. reading practices investigated favor the leading role of students in the development of readings; 2. the questions as important elements in the development of readings; and 3. the literary genre, when approached without interference of school tasks, can be a source of: critical reflections, aesthetical enjoyment, and sensitizing of the reader with regard to its humanizing character |