A construção dos saberes e práticas psicológicas na formação do psicólogo: configurações de uma experiência em Porto Alegre

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: Wojciekowski, Carla Fabiane
• Orientador(a): Pizzinato, Adolfo
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre
• Palavras-chave em Português: PSICOLOGIA; PSICÓLOGOS - FORMAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL; PSICÓLOGOS - PRÁTICA PROFISSIONAL; PSICOLOGIA - ESTÁGIOS
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/4985

This study aims to discuss the issue of training in psychology to understand how to build relationships of teaching / learning practices in the social psychological, investigating training opportunities that are offered through the experiences of students in Basic Stages (EBs). Reflection that develops from the experience of the researcher as supervisor initially and after local stage as academic supervisor, which required monitoring of students in the Foundation Stage mode linked to a Psychology Service of an undergraduate course in Psychology recently recognized by MEC in Porto Alegre. Part of building a corpus of speech samples from the field diaries of students, expanded by including the record of the researcher in his own field journal and supervision of academic attendance (period 2011/02 to 2012/01).From a theoretical pre-categorization / a priori definition of the main markers, guided by the objectives of the research records were grouped into two broad categories of discourse analysis: 1. Shaft construction practices called, includes the category "Learning While Doing" respect traditional practices and the emergence of new performances and actions in the light of proposals emphases 2. Axis representing the Relation with the emphases and talks about how to build the discourse of curricular emphases, creating the category "Borders of professional work: casualization and the demands and challenges in training. " It is understood that the categories listed reflect a contradiction / paradox facing the documents investigated (DC, ABEP, CREPOP / CFP): Professionals and students are invited / urged / caused the break with the practices called "traditional" and at the same time to invent, create, experience, knowledge, daring new knowledge and practices by presenting new possibilities / learning models and acting opposite a formation called "emerging". It discusses what it can generate / produce, move on training in psychology beyond the hegemonic forms already in the current general education proposal by DC.