A inclusão produtiva e os desafios para a PNAS e o SUAS

• Ano de defesa: 2009
• Autor(a) principal: Klein, Fernanda Bortolini
• Orientador(a): Guimarães, Gleny Terezinha Duro
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre
• Palavras-chave em Português: SERVIÇO SOCIAL; ASSISTÊNCIA SOCIAL; POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS; POLÍTICA SOCIAL; TRABALHO; DESIGUALDADE SOCIAL; GERAÇÃO DE EMPREGO - BRASIL; RENDA
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/5173

The production system driven by the productive restructuring led innovation and change as the construction of new forms of organization and working conditions. In front of the aggravation of social problems linked to this logic, many public policies have been directed for seeking the guarantee of the right to work and survival, including the Social Assistance Policy. The study aims to examine how alternative forms of generating employment and income recommended by the Unified Social Assistance- SUAS for the inclusion of productive users of the National Social Assistance- PNAS has contributed to the confrontation of social inequality. It is based on qualitative research, which type of sample used was intentional, the instruments used for data collection were the interview form semi-structured and systematic observation. This research showed that the alternatives of productive inclusion promoted by SUAS, not currently contributed to confront social inequality, whereas the levels of disparity are exposed users do not reduce its participation in alternatives. Therefore, we can say that in terms of economic and social, these alternatives of productive inclusion are emergency and small, because they do not allow satisfaction of basic needs, are far from providing a decent life, with access to income and other social rights. But also found that these alternatives show contradictions, because at the same time, prospects are perceived as self-analysis and organization principles for the process of self-management. In this sense the procedure of Productive Inclusion in Social Policy is in development, the path has obstacles that generate anxiety, resistance and power struggles. But both are processes allow reflections, as restless professionals, who see themselves on the face of new ways to play their roles and challenged to take up new spaces.