Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Miguel, Carolina Mariane
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Stangherlim, Roberta
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Stangherlim, Roberta
,
Castanho, Marisa Irene Siqueira
,
Vercelli, Ligia de Carvalho Abões
,
Carceglia, Daniel Mario |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Nove de Julho
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Mestrado em Gestão e Práticas Educacionais
|
| Departamento: |
Educação
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Espanhol: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/1208
|
Resumo: |
This study has as its subject conceptions and reading practices expressed in final year childhood education teachers’ registries and talks. The main goal is to analyse these reading and writing conceptions and practices in a school in Santo André – SP. Its subjects are 6 teachers who work with 4 and 5 year-old children and the pedagogic assistant from the same school. To discuss reading and writing, this work will use the theories proposed by Ferreiro & Teberosky (1985), Ferreiro (2004) and Lerner (2002). Contributing with the question regarding public policies and the pedagogic perspective of work in childhood education there are the works from Oliveira (2014) and Kramer (2006). This research’s methodology has a qualitative character (ANDRÉ, 2001), such as an intervention-research based on action-counteraction-action from the educational praxis (FREIRE, 1993, 2003), and have been developed as a data collection procedure: a. documental analysis of the school’s Political-Educational Project, from semi-annual planning, from the teachers’ diaries and group reports; b. 3 (three) continuing education meetings in service with participating teachers; c. 2 (two) individual interviews with the school’s pedagogic assistant. These discourses were analysed by Bardin’s content analysis (2011). Regarding the results, it is possible to recognize that the teachers are following a path that shows some distancing from preparatory practices for literacy, which are historically characterized by the presentation of letters, one by one, in alphabetic order, copies and letter contours, amongst other mechanic-perceptive exercises and, in a movement of overcoming such perception of literacy, they intend to include daily reading practices, activities in which children are encouraged to read and write words and texts from their respective contexts. However, such process is marked by contradictions, since the town’s public policy does not provide a clear guidance regarding childhood education literacy. The courses promoted by the Education Secretariat to their professionals emphasise concepts of childhood, of playing and of childhood culture, but do not specifically touch the question of reading and writing. In this context, it is noted that there are conflicting concepts and practices regarding the mode by which literacy for 4 and 5 year-olds in the public school is conducted and the reasons for that. It is concluded that an in-service continuing education policy articulated with childhood education and elementary education curricular guides could be organically organised, in a continued perspective of reading and writing learning processes, considering the educational needs from both teachers and children inserted into this educational system. |
