Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2009 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Rodrigues, Adriani Milli
 |
Orientador(a): |
Ribeiro, Cláudio Oliveira
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Higuet, Etienne Alfred
,
Cavalcante, Ronaldo de Paula
 |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Metodista de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
PÓS GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS DA RELIGIÃO
|
Departamento: |
1. Ciências Sociais e Religião 2. Literatura e Religião no Mundo Bíblico 3. Práxis Religiosa e Socie
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/527
|
Resumo: |
The critique of religion is a recurrent theme on modern thought and appears even in the theology of this period. In this context, the present study focus on the comparison of the critique on religion in Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonheffer s thought. Therefore, the dissertation is organized in four main parts. Initially, it s done a contextualization of the western conception on religion and it s modern critique, including the theological ambit. Next, it s describe the conception and the critiques of religion on Barth and Bonhoeffer`s thought. Finally, a comparison it s made between both authors, on which delineate approximations and dissimilitudes of the critiques on religion of this two theologians. In a broad way, these two critiques indicate distortions of Christianity and proposals of restorations. As a key to comparison is the perception that Barth criticize religion on the perspectives of revelation, whereas Bonhoeffer makes his criticism on the perspective of life.(AU) |