Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Souza, Lucimeire da Costa Vieira de |
| Orientador(a): |
Kaefer, José Ademar |
| Banca de defesa: |
Francisco, Edson de Faria,
Mendonça , Élcio Valmiro Sales de |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Metodista de Sao Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Ciencias da Religiao
|
| Departamento: |
Ciencias da Religiao:Programa de Pos Graduacao em Ciencias da Religiao
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/2206
|
Resumo: |
The purpose of this research is to present the story of Isboshet behind the tradition of 2Samuel 2,1-11. Despite the low visibility in biblical texts, the character presents strong indications of his relevance in the formative period of Northern Israel. To achieve our goal, the historical-critical method will be used, focusing on the criticism of form. In the text of 2 Sam 2,1-11, a change of focus in the narrative in the first verses can be clearly seen: David is the protagonist who addresses Jabesh of Gilead and proposes his kingship; in the following verses, ignoring David's initiative, the chief of Saul's army, Abner, takes Isboshet to Gilead and simply sets him up as king. Another dissonance that we can observe is regarding the territorial extension of the two kingdoms: David rules only the house of Judah, while Isboshet rules over a much larger territory. The common interpretation of this text says that David succeeds Saul and begins to reign over the entire territory of Israel and Judah, it is the beginning of the so-called united monarchy under the primacy of the Davidic house. On the other hand, according to recent archaeological research, Jerusalem in the 19th century X BC, from where David would build his "empire", would be a small, poor and marginal village. How to reconcile the different information suggested by the biblical text and by historical and archaeological evidence? Is it possible to place the period in which the conflict between the house of David and the house of Isboshet would intensify? It is noted that the memory of Northern Israel underwent a series of reinterpretations from Judah, so behind the biblical tradition of Isboshet, the history of a strong political administrative entity, governed by the Saulid house and which established the foundations, may be hidden. for the formation of Northern Israel. (AU) |
