OS CONSELHOS DE CLASSE E SÉRIE PARTICIPATIVOS DAS ESCOLAS ESTADUAIS PAULISTAS: POSSIBILIDADES E LIMITES

• Ano de defesa: 2007
• Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Sueli Thodorof
• Orientador(a): Saes, Decio Azevedo Marques de
• Banca de defesa: Palma Filho, João Cardoso , Alves, Maria Leila
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Metodista de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: PÓS GRADUAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO
• Departamento: Educação
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Participação; Conselhos de Classe e Série; burocracia; concepções tradicionais patrimonialistas; contradições
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Participation; The Boards of Class and Serie; bureaucracy; traditional patrimonialist conceptions; contradictions
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Link de acesso: http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/1076

The present work focuses on one the most traditional constituent schools of the public schools in São Paulo: The Boards of Class and Serie. Concented to be rooms of collective evaluation with potencial to provide the construction or reconstruction of the Pedagogical Proposal, were reduced, in practice, to mere bureaucratic rituals, while many schools disconsider the legal demand that determines the participation of students in their instances. The study had as aim identification and analisis of the factors that interfere directly and indirectly in the implementation of participation of students and their parents in these constituent schools. Of empirical nature, the research is supported by the analisis of Maurício Tragtemberg, to whom the school works as a center of reproduction of relationship of production, while selects the students through what is named bureaucratic pedagogy . It was focused on one of the schools that included effectively students and their parents in the Boards of Class and Serie, confronting, during the process, the conflicts inherent to bureaucratic structure of the scholar institution. We have perceived that the practice of the majority of the professionals of schools, specially of teachers, keep themselves pierced by traditional representations of patrimonialist character, in the sense pointed out by Weber, in contrast to the effort of the team of direction in deepening the participation of the students and their parents in constituent schools. The traditional representations cohabit and integrate to bureaucratic structure of public school, consisting in one of the principal obstacles to effective participation. We have decided for participant observation, in virtue of our double insertion in this process: as through lecture in public school of the state net as of the drill of a post of specialist in Board of Directors of Education methodological procedure which has allowed us a range of data from various schools, permitting the establishment of some relevant comparisons to the proposed study.(AU)