Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Scarrone, Flavio |
Orientador(a): |
Wirth, Lauri Emilio
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Banca de defesa: |
Sung, Jung Mo
,
Oliveira, Cladio Ribeiro de
,
Brito, Enio Jose da Costa,
Campos, Breno Martins |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Metodista de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
PÓS GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS DA RELIGIÃO
|
Departamento: |
1. Ciências Sociais e Religião 2. Literatura e Religião no Mundo Bíblico 3. Práxis Religiosa e Socie
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/256
|
Resumo: |
The present research aims to demonstrate the contribution of the concept of subject in Franz Hinkelammert for the study of religion. It is intended to show the epistemologist critical value of this concept, comprehensible to the light of the transcendental dialectical method discovered by Marx and developed by Hinkelammert, allowing its applicability to the study of sciences of religion. Seeks to answer the question posed by Boaventura de Sousa Santos about the possibility of enhancing the emancipatory potential of rebels subjectivities, aiming at overcoming the abstract conception of the subject of empirical sciences, whose scientific methodology is based on the scientific neutral objectivity of the Weberian character. For this purpose, we analyze the relationship between this conception and the consequent human sacrifices. The invisibility or the resigned acceptance of these sacrifices show the necessity of the epistemological need of adopting the concept of subject as a criterion of scientific analysis and insight, leading to the discovery and criticism of unconscious relational dynamics that govern societies given the inertia of their structures. It is a concept that implies a subjective theology - in which, God is present as an accomplice of the resistance of the victims against the rulers - and as a non-religious criterion that ends in an autonomous ethics, which is concerned with a humanizing religious praxis. |