Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Filipe Furlan Bellotti |
Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
eng |
Instituição de defesa: |
Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://www.bd.bibl.ita.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=2056
|
Resumo: |
We found universal laws for the spectrum of two-dimensional three-body systems, composed by two identical particles and a distinct one (AAB). These universal laws appear when the potential range (r_0) is much smaller than the size of the system. In two dimensions this condition is formulated as (E2 is the two-body energy and ? is the reduced mass). The zero range model, which is very appropriated to establish the universal laws, is introduced through the ?-Dirac potential. We derive the corresponding two-dimensional Faddeev equations for the three-body system and solve them numerically in momentum space. Our results showed that the three-body binding energy monotonically increases with the two-body binding energy, and such dependence is more pronounced than the mass variations. We found that the three-body energy depends logarithmic on the two-body energy for large values. Furthermore, been m=mB/mA the ratio between the masses of the B and A particles, the three-body energy is mass-independent for m ? ? and increase without bounds for m ?0. The limit of two non-interacting identical particles is also studied in the AAB system. We found that the two-dimensional three-body system always support at least two bound states and more bound states appear for m<0.22. Finally, we analyze the particular limit of m ?0 using the adiabatic approximation. This approximation can be used to study the three-body system in two-dimensions with an accuracy better than 10% compared to the solutions of the Faddeev equations, for m ? 0.01. |