Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Denardi, André Dell’Isola
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Orientador(a): |
Costa, Bruno Lazzarotti Diniz
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Banca de defesa: |
Brasil, Flávia Duque,
Santos, Manoel Leonardo Wanderley Duarte |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Fundação João Pinheiro
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Mestrado em Administração Pública
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Governo Professor Paulo Neves de Carvalho
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/tede/428
|
Resumo: |
The research carried out was intended to highlight the role and influence of the Legislative Assembly of Minas Gerais in public education policies in the State, based on the State Educational Plan, which took place in the Minas Gerais parliament between 2015 and 2018. For this purpose, it is based on a theoretical revision on the Legislative Power, its institutional evolution in Minas Gerais and its insertion within the national federative model and related with other constituted Powers; analysis of the development of education as public policy in Brazil and Minas Gerais, its main legal provisions and the constitutional competences of member states related to it; and quantitative and qualitative analysis of data on the State Plan of Education in the Legislative Assembly of Minas Gerais. The results showed that the Minas Gerais Legislative Power made a great effort to create platforms for the public debate of the State Education Plan, bringing together, in partnership with the Executive Power, various sectors of civil society to discuss the goals and strategies of the Plan. Through the creation of a diverse and plural Organizing Committee, a Technical Forum that internalized the debate regarding the Plan and the entire legislative process that took place in the following years, different arenas of debate were identified in which different actors took advantage of certain strategies to assert their interests. This situation proved the good exercise of the Legislative Power in promoting the debate around the Plan and interfering in its content. |